Critical care clinicians can change physiology with a number of tools. They can repeatedly, often and mercilessly change physiological variables. They can increase the blood pressure (or decrease it); they can increase cardiac output (or decrease it), they can increase cardiac filling pressures (or decrease them), they can increase glucose levels (or decrease them), they can increase positive fluid balance (or decrease it) and so on. This kind of “numerology” is attractive because the outcomes are tautological and clinicians feel powerful and effective. However, outside the obvious situations where physiology is so dangerously abnormal as to threaten life, such physiological manipulations have an unproven relationship with outcome. Importantly, patients do not care whether their cardiac output has been increased from 5L/min to 6 L/min. They only care whether they live or die, get out of hospital intact and return to their previous life. Thus, physiological gain is not patient centred. Moreover, all research focusing of the physiology of a specific intervention always and inevitably deals with the effect on a specific set of variables. For example and fluid bolus may or may not increase cardiac output for a while. Thus studies focus on identifying fluid responders for such purposes. However, no one studies the effect of such fluid bolus on anything other than hemodynamics. No one measures what the effect is on the immune system, cerebral edema, the glycocalyx, interstitial oxygen gradient, pulmonary congestion, body temperature, haemoglobin and white cell function etc. etc. Thus, all physiological studies are “blind” to the effects that their protagonists cannot or will not measure. In other words, the measurable is made important but the important may not be measured. Clinicians need to reflect on this before they become seduced by physiological manipulation.
The Problem with Physiology
-
SonoBYTE: Airway Ultrasound by Jacob Avila & Ben Smith
Phoebe Adams, , The Talks DASsmacc, Airway Ultrasound, SonoBYTE, 0
Intubation is one of the most important procedures that we perform. There are many immediate and bedside methods of...
-
SMACCForce: Code crimson-marginal gains to save a life by Wolfgang Voelckel
Phoebe Adams, , The Talks DASsmacc, ASSESSMENT, damage control, Fluid resuscitation, haemorrhagic shock, haemostatic resuscitation, Hypotensive resuscitation, physiologic response, Trauma, vasopressor drugs, 0
Exsanguination and brain injury are the leading causes of death after major trauma. During the last decades, significant progress...
-
16 Bits of Anaphylaxis by Daniel Cabrera
Phoebe Adams, , The Talks DASsmacc, Anaphylaxis, 0
Anaphylaxis is a relatively common and potentially lethal emergency. Current definitions highlight the presence of allergic and allergic-like reactions...
-
How to Fail by Kevin Fong
Phoebe Adams, , The Talks DASsmacc, Failure, 0
Useful advice on how to fail at everything.
-
‘Everything’ at the End of Life
Phoebe Adams, , 2017, The Talks DASsmacc, critical care, Dying, End of life, 0
The meaning of ‘everything’ from the perspective of the patient, their family, their doctor and their health economist. We...
-
Making Complex Problems Simple
Phoebe Adams, , 2017, The Talks DASsmacc, psychological, Resuscitation, 0
Resuscitation is complicated, but the solutions don’t have to be. These are the psychological hacks that will help you...
-
-
In Honour of the Clot (Consider the Lobster)
Phoebe Adams, , 2017, The Talks DASsmacc, Coagulation, Dinosaurs, Evolution, Fibrinogen, haemorrhage, Lobsters, thrombolysis, tPA, 0
A talk about David Foster Wallace, evolution, and what do when the thrombolysis bisque hits the fan.